

- REASON FOR QUEENS NEIGHBORHOOD DISPERSIO IN SOCIOLOGLY SOFTWARE
- REASON FOR QUEENS NEIGHBORHOOD DISPERSIO IN SOCIOLOGLY FREE
Hot spots policing has become a very popular way for police departments to prevent crime.
REASON FOR QUEENS NEIGHBORHOOD DISPERSIO IN SOCIOLOGLY SOFTWARE
The availability of powerful crime mapping software packages has allowed police departments to identify and address problem places more easily than was previously possible in the days when pin maps were necessary to examine crime concentrations (Weisburd & Lum, 2005). Putting police officers in high crime locations may be an old and well‐established idea however, in the long history of policing, police crime prevention strategies did not focus systematically on crime hot spots until only very recently (Braga & Schnell, 2018). 90) suggests in his classic study of police work, some officers know “the shops, stores, warehouses, restaurants, hotels, schools, playgrounds, and other public places in such a way that they can recognize at a glance whether what is going on within them is within the range of normalcy.” The traditional response to such trouble spots typically included heightened levels of patrol and increased opportunistic arrests and investigations. Police officers know the locations within their beats that tend to be trouble spots and are often very sensitive to signs of potential crimes across the places that comprise their beats. Police officers have long recognized the importance of place in crime problems. If we can prevent crime at these hot spots, then we might be able to control citywide crime levels (Weisburd, Braga, Groff, & Wooditch, 2017). The appeal of focusing limited resources on a small number of high‐activity crime places is straightforward. A number of researchers have argued that many crime problems can be reduced more efficiently if police officers focused their attention to these persistent high‐activity crime places (Braga & Weisburd, 2010 Sherman & Weisburd, 1995 Weisburd, 1997). More recent research has reinforced this idea of crime concentrations (Braga, Andresen, & Lawton, 2017) and led Weisburd ( 2015) to argue that there is a “law of crime concentration” at places showing not just that crime is concentrated but that it is concentrated at similar levels across cities and across time.
REASON FOR QUEENS NEIGHBORHOOD DISPERSIO IN SOCIOLOGLY FREE
Even within the most crime‐ridden neighborhoods, crime clusters at a few discrete locations and other areas are relatively crime free (Weisburd, Groff, & Yang, 2012). Rather, there is significant clustering of crime in small places, or “hot spots,” that generate half of all criminal events (Pierce, Spaar, & Briggs, 1988 Sherman, Gartin, & Buerger, 1989). A number of studies suggest that crime is not spread evenly across city landscapes. Over the past 30 years, crime scholars and practitioners have pointed to the potential benefits of focusing crime prevention efforts on crime places.
